Modern Liberalism's Second Childhood
by Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., M.D.
Thinking myself rather witty some years ago, I addressed my
daughter's then-current college boyfriend with an affectation of grave, fatherly
concern and the intention to tweak him: "Well, Ed," I intoned, "what do you
want to be when you grow up?" Not missing a beat, he replied with a straight
face: "A grown-up."
Touché. Had I been in
a different mood, I would have asked the question clearly begged by his answer:
what, after all, is a grown-up? Well, the answer
is, it depends. In a free society, a modal
grown-up is a self-reliant, voluntarily cooperative, morally responsible and
mutually thoughtful citizen with wired-in altruistic instincts that lead to charitable
caretaking. Those of us who care about
our children raise them with exactly these virtues in mind. We raise them to take care of themselves, not
to be burdensome to others, as children are. We raise them to anticipate the
consequences of their actions and hold themselves accountable, not act impulsively
or blame others, as children do. We
raise them to help others routinely, not act selfishly, as children do. We raise them to cooperate with others toward
shared goals and win-win outcomes, not exploit or manipulate others with lies
or intimidation, as children do.
Those of us who love both our kids and our freedom teach the
former what's essential to the latter: we teach them what's right and what's wrong,
then hold them to high moral standards by the time they're teenagers. And we instill
in their souls those traditional virtues such as kindness and courage and patience
and determination that make life better for everyone. This is what a free
society expects to happen during what is supposed to be a young citizen's first
and only childhood. We prepare him to be
a competent adult.
We do these things because we know intuitively that the
non-negotiable price of freedom is a set of moral duties, not just legal
obligations. All of us have a moral duty
to take care of ourselves as best we may so we can pursue happiness in good enough
health and adequate material security.
All of us have a moral duty to avoid saddling our fellow citizens with the
burden of our problems, whatever their type. In fact, a careful analysis of the
human condition reveals that freedom is a state of being that one must constantly
earn by fulfilling certain obligations, both legal and moral, first in relation
to oneself and then in relation to others. Freedom is not a free lunch. It is not self-indulgence. The freedom that made America the
greatest nation in history is not freedom from want or work, nor freedom from
existential angst, or from the inevitable tragedies of life. Freedom is not my
entitlement to your time, effort or labor.
Freedom is not your duty to bail me out of whatever mess I've made of my
life. Freedom is not the duty of govern-ment to secure my health or safety, subsidize
my life, or guarantee economic equality among its citizens. In a free society, a grown-up takes care of
himself for his own sake and that of others, and he does it with pride. In a
free society, a grown-up has grown up.
In our contemporary collectivist society, by contrast, a
grown-up does not in fact grow up but remains instead an adult child of The
Modern Parental State. Like all collectivist states, this one undermines the
citizen's self-reliance and aborts his growth to maturity. Its oppressive
regulations obstruct his freedom to cooperate voluntarily with others. Its
intrusive welfare programs preempt his natural inclinations to charity. Its permissive
culture promotes sexual acting out, with all of its terrible consequences:
sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancies and abortions, and the
devastating effects of infidelity brought upon marriages and families. But it also rationalizes violence by
attributing it to social factors instead of personal choice, promotes blaming
and complaining through its victim-villain paradigm, and undermines the
character of adult citizens by constantly inviting them to become wards of the
state, deeming them incompetent to manage their affairs and declaring them in
need of government guardians. The
effects of this infantilization of the people are both profound and perverse. But the effects on their liberties are at
least as devastating. In exchange for
the promise of lifelong security, the collectivized grown-up surrenders to a Hobbesian
monster the power to run his life. The result of this surrender is the
pseudo-adult life of the modern liberal agenda and the gradual degradation of freedom. There is no longer any surprise in these effects. The agenda invariably fails because its core
principles contradict the defining characteristics of human nature and abort
its potential for mature competence. The agenda's socialist goals are
antithetical to the human condition and for that reason can never be
realized. Yet, despite history's
repeated verdicts on collectivism, millions remain true believers. Those who
honestly believe that The Modern Parental State will benefit the masses, if
only the right geniuses can be found to run it, are simply deluded. But there
are many radicals liberals who do not believe.
They know that collectivism never works, but cynically pretend that it
will. They have a stake in the lie: those among them who end up running the state
quickly exempt themselves from the rules that oppress everyone else. And they
don't grow up either.
April 2008
|