Excerpt: Ordered Liberty
On the Ideals of a Ordered Liberty:
Thus, a society's values and expectations about what is right or just
influence the citizen's moral choices in economic, social and political
arenas at any moment. If society honors the principles of rational
individualism, the citizen's choices will be influenced by ideals of
individual liberty, self-reliance, personal responsibility, voluntary
cooperation, moral realism, and respect for the rights and sovereignty
of others. If, on the other hand, society honors the liberal agenda's
principles of coercive collectivism, then the citizen's choices will be
influenced by ideals of entitlement, welfare dependency, state
regulation, moral relativism, and the socialization of major categories
of human action.
Competent human beings understand that they must respect facts and
think logically about people and things. They understand that actions
have consequences, that certain actions make their lives better or
worse, and that certain rules must govern the behaviors of persons in
order to allow for individual freedoms and the preservation of social
order.
The ideal of personal autonomy, as evidenced in the capacity to act
independently through responsible self-direction, and the ideal of
social cooperation, as evidenced in the ability to work with others in
pursuit of shared goals for mutual benefit, are threshold developmental
achievements in the child's growth to competence. In a society
committed to individual liberty, individual responsibility and
individual assumption of risk, and in the interest of minimizing
actions that encroach on the persons and property of others, social
order requires that children be raised with at least minimal capacities
for self-direction and collaborative effort. Expectations that the
mature citizen will take care of himself and not coerce others into
that duty are consistent with a principle basic to freedom: that in a
free society, no one is born into the world with a legally enforceable
obligation to take care of persons other than his own children,
especially persons whom he has never met. Citizenship in a free
society should not entail a legal duty of care to strangers: that is,
a statutory mandate that you adopt one or more persons deemed deserving
by government officials.
Thus the goals of psychotherapy and the goals of child rearing share
the western ideal of individuated man: the autonomous, self-directed
and freely choosing but ethical and moral individual, an agent both
sovereign and social, who cooperates with others by mutual consent, not
by coercion, in a society ruled by law. Here, in language more
behavioral than philosophical, is the psycho-biologically based ideal
of individualism. The critical question to be asked, then, is whether
and to what extent the arrangements for living in a given society are
consistent with that ideal. More particularly, we ask whether and to
what extent the liberal agenda is consistent with that ideal.
To qualify as a validating environment for the citizen who has achieved
adult competence, a society must establish a basic set of rules that
permit freedom; it must establish the infrastructure of moral values
and legal protections that allow economic, social and political
processes to be conducted by mutual agreement.
The competent individual remains the primary economic, social and
political unit of the free society, the competent family continues to
be the primary socializing and civilizing institution, and the
competent society itself provides the overarching structure of ordered
liberty.
|